Good Things in Small Packages
(Web Note: a larger image that takes more time to download is available for the images of plans for the boats shown in this article. Simply click on the plan you are interested in to see the larger version and then just wait)
Searching for Perfection in a Little Boat When we were kids, picking a
suitable boat design was easy. In 1954 we had an aging five-horse Johnson and the desire to build a speedboat. Naturally, being 12 years old, we wanted to go as fast as possible. After
looking through Popular Science How-to-Build articles, we decided to nail
together an 8-foot hydro, using two sheets of fir plywood and some scrap lumber. We
launched the boat a week later (two scruffy coats of house paint), and enjoyed cheap
thrills for a summer. The
next season, having graduated to a well-used 10-horse outboard, we joined a neighborhood
friend in building Squirt, a diminutive Glen-L designstill the best 10-foot outboard
runabout weve experienced. Later,
we moved up to a faster 12-foot twin-cockpit runabout; then an eye-watering D
racing runabout with Mercury KG-9...and so forth until we were motoring around in
fair-sized, complex machines. Looking
back, our first boats were the best of all, in terms of smiles-per-dollar invested. They
were utterly simple; they were dirt cheap (relatively speaking), and we used them
voraciously until moving onfree of guilt--to our next boat. Not
long ago, while photographing classic speedboats at a museum on Lake Como, in northern
Italy, our childhood passion for small, fast boats was rekindled. One of the Lake Como
boats was a small, early-1930s inboard designed and build by Baglietto, who could
perhaps be described as the Hacker of Italian boat design in the 30s. The
experience--ripping around the lake in the Baglietto, with its throaty 4-cylinder Italian
racing engine--stimulated our search for The Perfect Little Inboard Runabout. Gradually,
we zeroed in on parameters for a mini-dreamboat. For the purpose of the exercise, we
decided to focus on boats that were 14 feet or shorter; that could be powered by some of
the smallest inboard engines; that most likely would accommodate only two adultsbut
might hold four as an unexpected bonus. We saw the ideal little runabout as easy to build
(and store) in a one-car garage; as a delight to handle on a trailer, and abnormally
beautiful for its size. Blistering speed would be fine, but we realized, happily, that in
a boat of modest size, the illusion of great forward progress comes easily. Presented
here are five runabout designs from four different designers. We like all of them, and
think each design is worth considering if you, too, are intrigued by the idea of
dazzling-yet-affordable little boats. MARYBELLE John
Hacker, designer Marybelle
first appeared in Motor Boating magazine around 1930, as the scaled-down version of an
18-foot Hacker design. While described as a runabout, shes really what
we today might call a launch, since her suggested 4-hp Kermath engine will deliver only
about 8 mph.
Basically,
Marybelle offers the layout of a traditional 25-foot launch, squeezed into a 14-footer.
The boat has a long foredeck, with the engine forward of a solid bulkhead. Two bench seats
are behind the bulkhead, along with a modest aft deck. She
would be fairly dry and comfortable as a lake boat or tender to a larger yacht. If we had
Marybelle in local waters, for instance, shed be used to putter among houseboats and other wonders of
Seattles Lake Washington Ship Canal. On quiet dayswhen the Bayliners were held
at bay--you could venture out into Lake Washington. (With Marybelles short length
and modest speed, you could putt-putt through marina channels all day long, critiquing
other boats while enjoying a picnic and the economies of a modest engine.) We
have a fully restored 5-hp Kermath Sea Pup thats ready to go in Marybelle or
something like her, but the design search continues. The
boat could be driven to greater speeds if you opted for a more powerful engine, but
youd need to watch your weight: No engine over about 250 pounds should be
considered. RESTLESS William
Atkin, designer Restless
is the next step up from Marybelle, in terms of horsepower and speed potential. Shes
still a 14-footer, but with a beam of 5-1 and lower freeboard of
1-8-1/2. Construction involves a double-planked mahogany bottom (two layers of
1/4, with a diagonal
Unlike
a lot of runabouts, Restless has a genuine keel, eliminating the need for a strut and
conventional through-hull shaft log. While this detracts from speed potential, it saves a
few bucks
and we arent talking about blinding speed with Restless, anyway. The
rudder is a simple wooden affair, with bronze pintles and gudgeons--old fashioned but
effective for this little craft. The
engine specified in the 1930s was a four-cylinder of 135 cubic inches, weighing
approximately 350 pounds. Turning a 10-inch
diameter propeller at 3,000 rpm, boat speed was calculated at between 25 and 26 mph. A modern four cylinder powerplant, such as a 3.0L
GM block, would deliver great performance. The
boat carries a 22 gallon gas tank under the stern deck.
Seating is for two, as you can see, making Restless a delightful boat that
stays within its 14-foot comfort zone not trying to be something it isnt. 125 to 151 Class step hydroplane John
Hacker, designer At
first we were reluctant to display Restless alongside Hornet, since their side profiles
are similar. We decided to go ahead, realizing that the two boats are actually very
different.
Built
for the 125 racing class with a 47-horse motor and overall weight of 750 pounds (boat,
engine and everything), the designer of Hornet claimed a speed of 40 mph. Plans
and building instructions for Hornet appear in the 1934 book by Edwin Monk, How to Build
Wooden Boats, reprinted in 1992 by Dover Publications and still widely available. FLYER 15-foot step hydroplane Bruce
Crandall, designer Crandall
designed a stunning collection of raceboats for Motor
Boating magazine, many of them bearing the Flyer
name, and this 1936 model is our all-time favorite.
Flyer is a classic streamliner, designed to carry
most of her weight on the foreplane so that a wide afterplane is not necessary. (Good
thing, because the planing surface narrows to only 16 inches at the transom!) While
the boat looks like a bear to plank, its not bad if you consider the pointed stern
as nothing more than an upside-down bow....which is exactly what youre dealing with. If
you plan to take a companion out in Flyer, be
sure theyre a close friend--this is a
small boat with a very cozy cockpit. The
original engine suggested for the 135 cubic-inch class was a Universal Blue Jacket Racer, a flathead four. Assuming you
dont have a Blue Jacket Racer in the
basement, you might consider a modern four-cylinder marine engine or, for the ultimate
power-to-weight ratio, Rotary Power Marine Corporations super-compact 175-hp engine,
which would produce speeds to match the breathtaking appeal of this little boat. We
may build a few Flyers this winter for
customersincluding a stretched 18-1/2-foot version of the Crandall boat. (If
youre curious, get in touch and well let you know how they turn out.) 14-foot runabout David
D. Beach, designer After
showcasing several little boats from the 1930s, we shift to the early 1950s to
review Mucho Gusto, a flashy hot-rod designed
around the Crosley four-cylinder inboard, which was used extensively in the 48 cubic-inch
three-point hydro class.
The
biggest difference between Mucho Gusto and the
other pint-sized runabouts is its construction. While the earlier designs feature
traditional plank-on-frame, Mucho Gusto is built
with 1/4-inch marine plywood over sawn frames. Shes also several inches beamier than
the 1930s boats, with non-trip chines and a beautiful reverse sheer that nearly
drops into the water at the stern. Mucho
Gusto
appeared in Sports Afield magazines Boatbuilding Annual. We havent run into the
design elsewhere, and certainly havent seen one of the boats on the water, but it
would be a terrific performer and great-looking boat, employing the most compact
four-cylinder engine you could come up with
or the rotary powerplant mentioned above.
|
|